Mike was one of the long term active members of the Australian -American Association at first as a member and then successively, Secretary, Vice President and then President of the Junior Australian-American Association He then became a member of the senior Association and one of its Committee Chairmen.
Mike was a Solicitor by Profession and a member of the Council of St. John's College at Sydney University. He had originally come from Gunnedah, where I believe his Father had been Mayor. Mike did his schooling at St.Joseph's College Hunter's Hill as a Boarder. He was a devout Catholic and had very broad interests in public affairs and politics as well as religion.He was never married. His brother is a Priest.
Mike and I shared our religion, our interest in the Australian -American Association , our Membership at the time, of the Royal Automobile Club
and a conservative view of Political matters. We used to dine at the RAC approx. monthly and after an enjoyable dinner we would adjourn to the Members' Lounge for Coffee and a Chartreuse or two ( thus stimulating the Monastic economy) and it was in that setting that very many of the World's problems were solved ( without any apparent external effect!)
Mike was a guest at our wedding when Robyn and I married in 1970, and a regular Dinner guest over the years, as we were to become at his home.
He was a very good man, and a thoroughly honourable man. Though his opinions and mine rarely differed, he was always that little bit more generous and formal in his judgement of the "baddies"in many cases. I admired that in him. We shared many grand occasions, particularly in connection with the United States Navy. I particularly enjoy the memory of Mike and I being invited to Lunch aboard the Nuclear -powered Guided Missile Cruiser U.S.S. LONG BEACH a beautifully designed and large ship moored out in the roadstead opposite Farm Cove. We were to be collected from a landing on the Western side of Farm Cove. Across from the ship came a huge Admiral's Barge and we were borne in great state to the Port Side Ladder, climbed the very high ship's side and were greeted by a full Side Party , saluted to and welcomed aboard as if we were Royalty. We were both embarrassed, but Mike the more so, because he was a very shy and unassuming person, though a great stickler for propriety.
If he cares to look down from above, I am sure he will have a chuckle at my efforts to get all the brush strokes right in this brief verbal portrait.
Mike we miss you very much and pray for the repose of your soul .
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Saturday, November 26, 2011
*1957 - THE SEMINARY
This used to be Saint Columba's Minor Seminary Springwood - Now a High School At least they have a fine Chapel - I wonder how well it is used. |
1957 THE SEMINARY
CALLED
The letter
from the Seminary duly arrived, confirming my acceptance and spelling out what
I would need to bring with me and specifying the commencement date. I think it
also mentioned the particular train from Central Station to Springwood which
would be used by the majority of students. The extra passenger load called for
two more carriages than the train usually ran.
There was much
to be done in the remaining weeks before commencement. Now that I think of it,
it would have been great to have had contact with a current Seminarian to get
more detailed familiarisation with Seminary life. That was not the case and
Father McGovern the Archdiocesan Vocations Director remained available and
helpful. There was clothing to be bought - Cassock, Roman Collar, Surplice and
Biretta and a dark suit and black tie and white shirt. There were also books to
be procured, though the weighty Liber Usualis, if I remember rightly, was
purchased through the Seminary.
KITTED OUT
The Cassock
was made to measure by an Order of Nuns in Annandale, on Pyrmont Bridge Road I
think. I vividly remember sitting in prolonged silence on a settle in the
gleaming polished corridor of the Convent until a distant but nearing swishing
of a religious habit heralded the arrival of a Nun to usher me into a workroom
where I was briskly measured up and asked to return in two weeks for fitting
and delivery. This I did and all was well. (Nuns in habits! Their very
appearance was a witness to their selfless commitment of their lives to God,
and their names in religion, spoke of that commitment."I gotta be me"
had to await the false "spirit of the Council".)
For the Roman
Collar, Surplice and Biretta, I went to Ambrosoli Brothers - one of a number of
clerical outfitters - all went smoothly. However the Biretta had to be ordered
in because they did not normally carry size 6 and7/8 ths in stock. My
"dome" challenged the system! I love the Biretta and am sorry to see
it so little used to-day. Nevertheless, I have never been a "hat person"
and have never felt right wearing one.
Fully Kitted Out -Don Camillo says: "The hands are to bless Lord, but the feet....?" |
In due course
I was completely "kitted out" and ready to leave, well in advance of
the required day.
NOT AN ALTAR
SERVER
I HAD NEVER BEEN AN ALTAR SERVER - THAT PRIVILEGE LAY 35 YEARS IN THE FUTURE Here the saintly,brilliant and charismatic Archbishop Fulton Sheen |
ON OUR WAY
Back to my story.
On Wednesday 15th February, 1957 I headed off to Central Station to join the
nominated Springwood bound train. We all gathered on the appropriate Country
Train Platform of the great Central Railway Station. We could readily identify
each other as members of the group, most of a certain age, all soberly dressed
in dark suit and black tie and carrying a bag and most attended by parents and
siblings to see us off.
It was a
pretty good reflection on the Church as she was in Australia before the Second
Vatican Council, that so many young men were inspired to answer the call they
believed they had received to become Priests. In most cases it reflected
admiration for a Priest or Priests they had known. There were to be 52 at the
beginning of our First Year Philosophy Class - by the end of that year the
number would be down to 44 I believe, and I was one of the drop outs. This was
a pretty normal evolution in the numbers each year.
The good,
solid C36 Class steam locomotive blew its whistle, final goodbyes were waved
and called out and our train gingerly threaded its way through the maze of tracks
and points, until it found itself on the Main Western Line.
C36 Class Loco of the type working the passenger trains to and from the Blue Mountains |
I don't really
recall much of the trip. I do remember there was a lot of banter among those
who knew each other and returning students from the previous year. There was
obviously a lot of "in" talk that only made sense to those who knew
the personalities, situations and subjects of the conversation. It was all
clearly good hearted. Being rather shy in any case, and not knowing any of the
background to the banter, I said little and kept largely to myself.
"COLUMBA
PENNA NIVEA"
After the hard
slog uphill from the coastal plain at Penrith, our sturdy loco paused at
Springwood where we detrained, before continuing its climb up the Blue
Mountains to the summit at Katoomba. For our part we piled into the buses
waiting to take us the few miles to the North to St. Columba's College. The old
hands began to sing the College hymn/theme song "Columba Penna Nivea"
which carried us through the Gates and up the curving driveway. Tradition was
being observed and I loved it!
On arrival
there was much greeting from students from other Dioceses (for this was a
Provincial Seminary for the Province of Sydney which takes in the whole of New
South Wales) who had arrived earlier. The atmosphere was one of happy
excitement. But there was essential business to be done. College Professorial
staff and appointed Prefects soon had lists of designated Dormitory occupants
and we were detailed off to our austere Dormitories and then after leaving our
bags by our iron framed beds, we were shown the shower stalls and the toilets
and given a brief run-down as to what was expected of us in matters of
timeliness. It was immediately clear that this was a tightly run ship. (The
experience was to stand me in good stead in future years on shipboard in the
Royal Australian Naval Reserve). That done, we moved quickly down to the Chapel
where we had time for reflection in the presence of Our Lord in the Blessed
Sacrament before joining in prayer for a productive year ahead.
We then moved
to the Refectory where Tea (in to-days parlance Dinner) was served. The
Refectory was close to the Main Entrance. It was a considerable room which
accommodated the 135 or so Seminarians at tables ranged on either side of the
room with one end butted against the respective walls and a broad aisle left
down the centre. Along the entry end wall was the table of the Rector and
Professorial Staff and, at the opposite end of the room a Lectern, at which
selected students read to those assembled who were required to eat in silence.
On special occasions the Rector would dispense with the silence rule by tapping
a glass with a piece of cutlery at the conclusion of Grace before Meals.
AMEN!
On this first
occasion we sat wherever we chose, but in due course we were to be allocated
specific tables within our Class groups with appointed Table Prefects. My
lasting impression of that first meal was of the resounding "AMEN!"
bouncing of the walls and relatively low ceiling from the throats of 135 fit
and healthy young men. As a group, I thought we sounded like a formidable team!
TOP TABLE TEAM
The
professorial Staff was of course headed by the Rector Monsignor
" Charlie
" Dunne - formidable, dour, and obviously in no sense a "fatherly
" figure, then came the Dean of Studies Dr George Joyner a Priest of
robust manly manner and deep booming voice, who was to teach us Latin and
Greek. He had a good sense of humour and I liked him from our first meeting. He
had a curious habit of inserting the word "anyway" up to four or five
times in a row into his lecturing monologues at any pause to collect his
thoughts. We were all amused at this little bit of professorial vulnerability ,
as only the arrogance of youth with its certainty of its group perfection, but
knowledge of its individual defects, can affect. Father Noel Carroll was our
Lecturer in Italian and I believe History. He was known as "say" for
his habit of using that Americanism as in: "Say, have you seen.....”He also had some other minor
Americanisms and tendencies in speech which the students blamed on his having
"changed planes once in Chicago". Thin and with eyes that tended to
bulge, he was, all in all, ripe for caricature and parody - grist for the
teenage student mill. Our Philosophy Lecturer was a tall young , plumpish Dr.
John Burnheim he was forever seeking examples to illustrate some abstract point
he was trying to make in Philosophy and all too often his eye would wander out
through the window and out he would come with "Now, take that
tree...." It became a cause for constant mimicry and amusement. His vague
manner suggested to this observer at least, a foggy mind induced by his
Philosophic studies at Louvain. Fulton Sheen he was not. Some years later after
a stint as Rector of St.John’s College at Sydney University, he left the Priesthood. I
was not surprised.
Father Bede
Heather was the Lecturer in Sacred Scripture, but I don't believe we had
started those studies when I left. He was known to the Seminarians jokingly as
the “Vulnerable
Bede" for his softness of character. He later became Bishop of Parramatta
and his episcopate was truly disastrous. During that time, he had overseen the
introduction of false religious education materials into the schools of the
Diocese, and when the errors were pointed out to him with crystal clarity,
chapter and verse; he dismissed the proof and did nothing. Two of his Priests,
having also received dismissive treatment, to say the least, formally took the
matter to the Holy See as they were bound in conscience to do. They were in
fact students in the Class above us in 1957. Talk about "bearing the heat
of the battle", the heroic Fathers John O’Neill and Carl Ashton had to bear the
sensationalist media scrutinising the issues and playing up the public
difference between the Church's teaching, which they were defending, and their
Ordinary.
Bishop Heather's lack of orthodoxy in matters of teaching etc extended to other areas, and in due course he developed a Roman illness and retired early though all too late, but at least quietly.
The Spiritual
Director was Father Ted Shepherd. As I look back on it, his approach to that
role seems to me to have been re-active rather than active, “seems to me" are the operative
words. I would not presume to judge him or the approach he adopted. They were
very different times, and it may very well be that he did not have the freedom
to adopt a different approach. What now seems to me to be an appropriate
approach to the Spiritual Direction of Seminarians would be active individual
and small group counselling and leadership in prayer, meditation, Lectio Divina
,Sacred Liturgy and the spiritual life. At the time, his pattern of operation
was all I knew, and possibly all he knew, and so I assumed that it was as it
ought to be.
Commencing some five or so years earlier in Gemany, this devout and brilliant young Seminarian was to be of extraordinary importance for the whole Church. |
Our Seminary
Day
We rose each
day at 6.00am, quickly showered and dressed to be downstairs in the Chapel at
6.30 am for Morning Prayer and brief Meditation before Holy Mass at 7.00 am. Allowing
time for Thanksgiving after receiving Holy Communion, we were to be back upstairs making our beds at 7.45 am. At 8.00 am we were in the Refectory for
Breakfast after which we were free until 9.00 am when Classes began. We had a
brief Recreation break from 11.00 am to 11.15 am when Classes resumed until 12.25
pm when there was a Recreation break until a brief Examination of Conscience
from 12.40 to 12.45 pm. At that time, Dinner (Lunch in these times) was served
in the Refectory. This was followed by Recreation until 1.40 pm at which time
Classes recommenced until 3.40 pm when we had Coffee. We were then free for
Recreation until 5.20 pm. At that time, we paid a visit to the Blessed
Sacrament and did Spiritual Reading.
Should it
happen that anyone who is not a Catholic is reading this, the term
"Spiritual Reading" might seem rather limiting and dull. Far from it!
The Catholic Church is 2,000 years old and rich beyond belief in writings and
reflections on every aspect of the Life of Jesus Christ, on Sacred Scripture,
on Prayer and the lives of the Saints. One could spend a long life trying to read,
let alone study, meditate on and pray over only a part of this Treasury of
Wisdom. The depth of this wisdom is amazing even when some of it has been
written in the so- called Dark Ages. And it is all the more cherished because
it has survived "dungeons, fire and sword” through persecutions, wars, all
manner of hostility and even temporary loss, to lift up the hearts of Catholic
people to Jesus Christ, God become Man.
On designated
days in our printed Calendar Book, Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament took
the place of the Visit and, on Wednesdays and Fridays; the Spiritual Reading
was displaced by a Spiritual Conference and the Stations of the Cross,
respectively.
At 6.30 pm Tea
(Dinner in these times) was served in the Refectory. At 7.20pm The Rosary was
recited in the Chapel, and at 7.35 pm we were in the Classrooms for Study. At
9.15 pm we walked around the Grounds until 9.30 pm when we gathered in the
Chapel for Night Prayers and Meditation Points. And finally at 10.00 pm we were
abed and lights were out. At first this furious pace of disciplined activity
was daunting, but it did not take long to get into the rhythm of it and we were
able to wear it lightly.
Saturdays were
business as usual, save for the Literary and Debating Society between 7.35 pm
and 9.00 pm. According to my recollection, we occasionally had films at that
time. These included:
Our movie for 18th March, 1957 |
March 18th.
The Lavender Hill Mob
March.25th
Religious Films
April
21st. The Barber of Seville
May 1st. Hobson's choice
I have always
had a loathing for amateur operated movie projectors, hating their all too
audible "clackety clack" noise of operation, the regular going out of
focus, slipping the teeth of the drive and more problems. So much easier to-day
(with due regard for warnings about public exhibition death and destruction etc.).
Sunday was
different. We did not rise until 6.30 am. Mass at 9.30 am was Solemn High Mass
or a Missa Cantata. It was followed by recreation from 10.30 am until 10.45 am
when the Rector's Conference took place followed by Recreation until 12.40pm.At
that time we had Spiritual Reading and Examination of Conscience. At 1.00 pm
Dinner was served in the Refectory followed by Recreation until 2.00 pm.Then
private reading and letter writing were allowed until 4.30pm when study was set
down until 5.30 pm and at 5.45 pm we prayed Vespers and had Benediction in the Chapel.
At 6.30 pm Tea was served in the Refectory followed by Recreation until 7.20
pm.Then we assembled in the Chapel for recitation of the Rosary followed by
study in the Classroom. At 9.00 pm we had Recreation via our nightly walk
around the grounds, assembled in the Chapel at 9.15 pm for Night Prayers and
Meditation Points until at 9.45 pm we were to be abed and it was lights out.
THE CHAPEL
The heart of
any Catholic Seminary is the Chapel. Here is the Eucharistic Lord every
Seminarian aspires to serve, reserved in the Tabernacle. Here the Seminarians
gather, arranged in Choir,along either side wall for the celebration of Holy
Mass and Benediction, for the praying of the Liturgical prayers of the Office and
for private prayer and Meditation. I have always rejoiced in the privilege of
living "under the same roof" as Our Lord,at Springwood and in later years on
Retreats and at Conferences. To be able easily to come into the Divine Presence
is a truly marvellous privilege. It was one that very many of the Seminarians
took continuing advantage of, dropping in to pay a visit as we Catholics say,
during Recreation times, or whenever it could be fitted in. This is where the
design of Churches and Chapels is so important. They must be places imbued with
the sense of the sacred, and conducive to prayer and devotion, not
"gathering places about the people”. Rather they must, by their shape,
proportions, materials and fittings lead the eye and the mind and all the
senses toward God Who is the object of our worship and devotion. Both at
Springwood and at Manly the Seminarians were blessed not only by the Presence
of Our Lord but also by Chapels designed and built and tended in full
appreciation of the dignity of their purpose , and nobly seeking to glorify God
come among us in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
*1957 TO THE SEMINARY
YOURS TRULY WEARING HOLY NAME SOCIETY BADGE READY FOR THE SEMINARY - NEEDS A BLACK TIE CAN A BIRETTA BE MADE TO FIT SIZE 6 7/8ths? |
1957. - TO THE
SEMINARY
For a very long time, I had hoped to become a Priest.
It was not a casually, or even easily, formed idea. Rather, it was one that I
struggled with. I have very clear recollections of a long period in which
sermons on the need for Priestly vocations used to really upset my peace of
mind, and cause pangs of conscience because I had put the idea out of my head
for a time.
I suppose the preparation of the "ground" to
receive the seed of the idea, dated back to my very early childhood and the
time of my First Holy Communion at age 7. From that time on Our Lord in the
Blessed Sacrament has captured my heart, soul and mind, and has, mercifully,
never let go even in times of very great distress. Naturally, loving Our Lord,
I loved the Catholic Church in which we are one with Him as He has intended.
So, it seems to me, it would not have been a large leap to be attracted to the
idea of Priesthood.
But the decision is not that simple, and one must
always be open to what God wants us to do, not simply what we might want to do.
And this balance is worked out in many and various ways, not always
predictable.
I believe it was in Second Year of High School in 1953,
at Marist Brothers High School Lidcombe that the idea of becoming a Priest
first crystallized in my mind. The Archdiocesan Vocations Director visited the
School and spoke to the senior classes. I don't recall his name - it may have
been Father Enright (? - probably not). Anyway, he was a good and sincere
Priest, not at all pre-possessing or charismatic - just your ordinary meat and
potatoes sort of Aussie. He spoke to those of us interested, individually. No
conclusions were reached of course, but I was a contact to be followed and glad
to be such.
In 1954 there was a new Vocations Director, Father
Kevin McGovern a short man with reddish hair. I admired him very much. He was a
typical hard-working Aussie Priest of that time, and Chaplain to the large
migrant community in the Chullora/Greenacre area. Chullora's principal claim to
fame was the massive Railway Workshops located on the large triangle of land
bounded on the North by the Regents Park to Enfield Marshalling Yards goods
line, and on the South-East by Liverpool Road. Across the railway to the North lay
the immense Rookwood Cemetery, one of the largest in the world.
Father McGovern lived an austere, tough life. From time
to time small groups of prospective Seminary entrants visited him for a few
hours in his home. It was either a demountable or a large caravan (I can't
focus my mental picture closely enough to say which, but there was scarcely
room to move).It was very cramped. He had no real privacy. Since his
"home" was sited on Workshops land, he had a steady stream of those
in his care coming to the door. It was an excellent introduction to the
unglamorous aspects of the life of a Priest. It certainly gave the lie to the
later glib jeers of false "spirit of the Council" types about
"Sacristy Priests “ in their imagined pre Conciliar Church! His was a tough
life, but with his strong Faith, he was the man for it. He obviously loved it.
Father spoke some Italian and, through various multilingual workers this gave
him the ability to communicate with workers from many countries. These were the
days of almost exclusively European migration. I vividly recall him relating
how one of his co-operants had complained to him that "it is impossible to
teach some of these people English - they don't even speak their own language
properly!"
Father McGovern arranged for groups of us to attend
open days at great Saint Patrick's College Manly, the Major Seminary. It's
massive sandstone pile dominated the scene above Manly Beach - the building
still does but, on a long term lease, it is now a Catering College (thanks? To
Cardinal Clancy).Its very beautiful Chapel with seating arranged in Choir is
still impressive ( though to turn a buck as the Americans say, it is hired out
for weddings, as in the case of Nicole Kidman etc.)
St Patrick's College Manly (the flags show it is a post Seminary days photo) |
Then, in 1956, Father took us on a tour of the Minor
Seminary, Saint Columba's at Springwood on the Blue Mountains. We went up by
car and entered the Seminary through the formal gateway and up the curved driveway.
We were greeted at the entrance by the gregarious Dr George Joyner whose deep
booming voice would become very familiar. Although not built on the heroic
lines of Manly, the Minor Seminary was impressive and ordered around a
quadrangle with a fine Chapel off it's Western side. Once again, the Chapel
seating was arranged in Choir and this was quite a novelty for most of us. Before
we were shown around the Seminary the formidable Rector, Monsignor
"Charlie" Dunne joined us and cast a critical eye over his
prospective charges.
Many tales are told of the legendary Monsignor Dunne. One I enjoy, which comes out of a long gone tradition of spiritual rigor and testing, involved calling a student to his office. As the student entered, he would inevitably be confronted by a letter "dropped" on the floor. If he chose to helpfully pick it up, he would be challenged for suggesting that the Rector kept an untidy office! If he ignored it he would be berated for being thoughtless and sloppy!
St.Columba's Minor Seminary Springwood (the Sign behind the car was not there when it was a Seminary- a "sign of the (bad) times I guess) |
Many tales are told of the legendary Monsignor Dunne. One I enjoy, which comes out of a long gone tradition of spiritual rigor and testing, involved calling a student to his office. As the student entered, he would inevitably be confronted by a letter "dropped" on the floor. If he chose to helpfully pick it up, he would be challenged for suggesting that the Rector kept an untidy office! If he ignored it he would be berated for being thoughtless and sloppy!
At least he would always treat the Rector with greater
caution!
Monsignor Dunne had a habit of holding the bottom
corner of the cape like lapel of his cassock with his left hand, which became a
cypher for those mimicking him to show who their intended target was. But that
lay in the future.
Toward the end of 1956 the time arrived to make a
formal application for admission to the Seminary. This brought to a head the
question of my parents' attitude to what I had intended. Both my Mum and Dad
were opposed. I am sure that it was a matter of genuine concern for what they
believed was in my best interest. But, in time, first Mum and then Dad came to
reluctantly agree to my seeking entry to the Seminary. This meant that I needed
to obtain a reference from our Parish Priest the Irish born Father Con Donovan,
whom I had known since my childhood.
But, as a family we were not "Churchy"
people, and certainly not ones to have close relations to the Clergy or
Religious - or, for that matter, to anyone else outside of family! So that
contacts with our PP were always at the formal level.
A giant of a gift from Ireland Parish Priest Father Con Donovan and at his feet LH Corner of pic -Yours Truly after First Holy Communion 1947 |
When I was about 7 or 8 Father had asked me after Mass
one weekday if I would be an Altar Server. I desperately wanted to say
"Yes!", but I was painfully shy and had always had it drummed into me
not to be pushy. So I said "No thank you." Father tried once more to
convince me, but when I again said "No" he put no pressure on me and
let the matter drop. I can recall sometime later the School Principal Sister
Austin, whose favourite I believe I was, expressing disappointment at my
decision - I think she had been the promoter of the idea. She was always very
kind to me and I loved her soft Irish accent and the lilting way she call led
me "An'tny" . God rest her Soul.
Then after a year or so, Father entrusted me one
morning after Mass to carry the Mass Kit up to the Presbytery. Such was the
state of my excitement at this Sacred Trust, that I stumbled unseen as I crossed
the grassy paddock, and the box fell to the ground. It appeared undamaged so I
said nothing. a week or so later, Father asked me one morning after Mass, if
anything had happened to the box when I carried it. I had to tell him. "Ah
well, that's it!" Said he. "There is a small dent in the Chalice, but
I shall be able to get it fixed -don't worry. Thanks!" And that was that. No
recriminations, not even a grim look - Pastor Bonus!
So I made an appointment and at the due time went to
the Presbytery where Father Donovan told me he would be happy to provide me
with a recommendation. We spoke about the fact that another young Parishoner
was about to enter another Seminary and then Father reminisced about his own
time at All Hallows Seminary in Ireland. I recall him saying that the Rector
there had forced the abandonment of Gaelic Football because the violence it
provoked was contrary to Christian Charity. When the time came to leave, I
found great difficulty in getting up out of the Lounge Chair in the Presbytery
Study. It was so constructed that the seat was very close to the floor. It was
very comfortable to sit in but left one flailing around like a maniac trying to
get up!
First Australian born Archbishop of Sydney __ Norman Thomas Cardinal Gilroy who enlisted in WWI by lowering his age, with Father Con Donovan
at the Blessing and opening of one of the many Church buildings erected in Father's hard working , self-effacing time.
First Australian born Archbishop of Sydney __ Norman Thomas Cardinal Gilroy who enlisted in WWI by lowering his age, with Father Con Donovan
at the Blessing and opening of one of the many Church buildings erected in Father's hard working , self-effacing time.
In due course I received a letter from the Seminary
requiring me to present myself at Saint Mary's Cathedral for
interview. I arrived in good time on the appointed day, and found that the
interviews were to be conducted in the Sacristy area . There was a large number
of us, and we gathered in a passageway off the Sacristy sitting on long pews.I
recall one of the students was greatly excited about his forthcoming visit to
the Melbourne Olympic Games. He is now a Priest in Sydney's West.
Finally I was ushered into the Sacristy where the
interviewing panel was headed by no less a person than the Archbishop, Cardinal
Norman Gilroy. Monsignor Dunne was also there and Dr. Joyner I believe , but I
couldn't vouch for the rest. But I think there were five in all.The word SILENCE in large red letters dominated the Sacristy.
His Eminence did almost all the talking, perhaps after
a brief introduction by the Rector. He was the soul of kindness and generosity
of spirit. He understood that I had gone to Marist Brothers Darlinghurst (about 14 miles from my home)to
preserve my Latin and knew that was a token of my earnest intention. But he was
concerned at the "great difficulty" such lengthy travel to and fro
each day must have been. I had never thought much about it. But I was mightily
impressed that a Cardinal could think of my personal difficulties.
In the end I was thanked for attending and told that I would receive a letter in due course. I walked out greatly relieved and joyful, and yet wondering how things would be. A visit to the Blessed Sacrament followed before I went out into the world it was all about saving.
In the end I was thanked for attending and told that I would receive a letter in due course. I walked out greatly relieved and joyful, and yet wondering how things would be. A visit to the Blessed Sacrament followed before I went out into the world it was all about saving.
Sunday, November 20, 2011
EX LIBRIS: "THE FABER BOOK OF REPORTAGE"II "DEATH OF A CLIMBING BOY
A CLIMBING BOY AND HIS MASTER |
EX LIBRIS:” THE FABER BOOK OF REPORTAGE II -"The
Climbing Boy"
“The regular reader (I believe there is one!) will
recall that I offered an extract from the FABER BOOK OF REPORTAGE only a short
while ago concerning the loss of H.M.S. Queen Mary at the Battle of Jutland in
WW I. But the book is such a rich source of interesting stories, that I thought
you deserves at least one more. And so I offer you "The Climbing Boy":
"
DEATH OF A
CLIMBING BOY, 29th March, 1813
Evidence taken
before The Parliamentary Committee on Climbing Boys, 1817
In 1817 a Committee of the House of Commons recommended
that the use of climbing boys be prohibited, but the recommendation was not
carried into effect.
On Monday
morning, 29th March 1813, a chimney sweeper of the name of Griggs attended to
sweep a small chimney in the brew house of Messrs. Calvert & Co. In Upper
Thames Street; he was accompanied by one of his boys, a lad of about eight
years of age, of the name of Thomas Pitt. The fire had been lighted as early as
2 o'clock the same morning, and was burning on the arrival of Griggs and his
little boy at eight. The fireplace was small, and an iron pipe projected from
the grate some little way into the flue. This the master was acquainted with
(having swept the chimneys in the brew house for some years), and therefore had
a tile or two broken from the roof, in order that the boy might descend the chimney.
He had no sooner extinguished the fire than he suffered the lad to go down; and
the consequence, as might be expected, was his almost immediate death, in a
state, no doubt, of inexpressible agony. The flue was of the narrowest
description, and must have retained heat sufficient to prevent the child's
return to the top, even supposing he had not approached the pipe belonging to the
grate, which must have been nearly red hot; this however was not clearly
ascertained on the inquest, though the appearance of the body would induce an
opinion that he had been unavoidably pressed against the pipe. Soon after his
descent, the master, who remained on the top, was apprehensive that something
had happened, and therefore desired him to come up; the answer of the boy was “I cannot come up master, I must die
here". An alarm was given in the brewhouse immediately that he had stuck
in the chimney, and a bricklayer who was at work near the spot attended, and
after knocking down part of the brickwork of the chimney, just above the
fireplace, made a hole sufficiently large to draw him through. A surgeon
attended, but all attempts to restore life were ineffectual. On inspecting the
body, various burns appeared; the fleshy part of the legs and a great part of
the feet more particularly were injured; those parts too by which climbing boys
most effectually ascend or descend chimneys, viz. the elbows and knees, seemed
burnt to the bone; from which it must be evident that the unhappy sufferer made
some attempts to return as soon as the horrors of his situation became
apparent. "
What can we
say, in the face of this horrible event? And in the face of the equally
horrible failure of the Parliament to act to protect these little ones? This
was only 200 years ago, scarcely three modern lifetimes, and in "England's
green and pleasant land" the Protestant new "Jerusalem".
It is, for me
at least, impossible not to be moved near to tears on reading, and even now
after a few years, on re-reading, this starkly tragic story.
I have had it
in mind to do this post for several days, and was particularly impressed by the
contrast in circumstances of the little boy Thomas Pitt and those of an
Anglican clergyman, no great Church dignitary, or noble ,the Rev'd John Simpson, who was born some years earlier and died in his eighties about the same time as
poor little Thomas.
PARSON JOHN SIMPSON'S HOME STOKE HALL DERBYSHIRE |
This parson had built himself a mansion of thirty rooms now
known as Stoke Hall which featured on a BBC “HOME RESTORATION" programme
screened here last night. The house was sumptuously decorated, in conception
grand, aping the stately homes of England and especially nearby Chatsworth. How
obscene that someone earning his income from rents on surrounding Church land
(probably stolen at the time of the Protestant Deformation) should use this
income for personal aggrandizement and not for religious works. His will, which
was granted Probate about the time poor little Thomas died, was a compilation
of his vast wealth , once again , largely the result of Church lands, but
bequeathed to his family in the greater part - obscene and in reality corrupt, bringing to
mind Anthony Trollope's "Barchester Chronicles".
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
*EX LIBRIS :"FIVE DAYS IN LONDON MAY 1940"
Amazing what goes on when you are in the cot!
There I was just 1 month and fifteen days old, all comfy and being fussed over in my Cot, and on the other side of the World the British Cabinet was meeting to discuss what should be done about the encircled British Expeditionary Force at Dunkirk, more than 300,000 men.
In this excellent Book of 236 pages, the Professor of History at Chestnut Hill College, Philadelphia at the time he wrote, John Lukacs explores the five days history of that War Cabinet Meeting.
It is an eye opener. He reveals how delicately the Cabinet was balanced between those who wanted to extract the BEF in order to be able to fight on, and those German sympathisers who wanted to come to terms with Hitler.Winston Churchill had been Prime Minister for 18 days when the crucial point of decision was reached during meeting commencing on 24th May, 1940 and concluding on 28th May, 1940 which just happened to be my Mother's 35th Birthday.
Churchill had himself briefly considered what might be the result of negotiations with "THAT MAN" - the loss of the Fleet, the Army , a puppet Government , possibly under Moseley, and decided it was intolerable and ultimately unthinkable. He believed that at best they might be able to rescue 50,000 of the BEF's men.
At 5.00pm he adjourned the War Cabinet and summoned a meeting of the full Cabinet of 29 and announced his intention that England should proceed to retrieve the BEF and fight on.No one demurred and at 7.00 pm he returned to the War Cabinet ( 5 persons) and told them what he had done. The "opposition"especially Lord Halifax was silent. The issue was resolved - the fight continued. As we now know, not 50,000 were saved but 338,626 were saved in the most extraordinary effort in defeat in the whole War. So extraordinary, saving the British Army and very many French soldiers as well, by the greatest muddling through ever, that it came to have the same morale boosting effect as many victories and has been remembered as a triumph.
Meanwhile, in far away Berala I slept on! And grew up to think it IMPOSSIBLE that we would do anything but WIN the War!
This is an exceptional book, which will reward any reader and give them pause, to think what might have been.
There I was just 1 month and fifteen days old, all comfy and being fussed over in my Cot, and on the other side of the World the British Cabinet was meeting to discuss what should be done about the encircled British Expeditionary Force at Dunkirk, more than 300,000 men.
In this excellent Book of 236 pages, the Professor of History at Chestnut Hill College, Philadelphia at the time he wrote, John Lukacs explores the five days history of that War Cabinet Meeting.
It is an eye opener. He reveals how delicately the Cabinet was balanced between those who wanted to extract the BEF in order to be able to fight on, and those German sympathisers who wanted to come to terms with Hitler.Winston Churchill had been Prime Minister for 18 days when the crucial point of decision was reached during meeting commencing on 24th May, 1940 and concluding on 28th May, 1940 which just happened to be my Mother's 35th Birthday.
Churchill had himself briefly considered what might be the result of negotiations with "THAT MAN" - the loss of the Fleet, the Army , a puppet Government , possibly under Moseley, and decided it was intolerable and ultimately unthinkable. He believed that at best they might be able to rescue 50,000 of the BEF's men.
At 5.00pm he adjourned the War Cabinet and summoned a meeting of the full Cabinet of 29 and announced his intention that England should proceed to retrieve the BEF and fight on.No one demurred and at 7.00 pm he returned to the War Cabinet ( 5 persons) and told them what he had done. The "opposition"especially Lord Halifax was silent. The issue was resolved - the fight continued. As we now know, not 50,000 were saved but 338,626 were saved in the most extraordinary effort in defeat in the whole War. So extraordinary, saving the British Army and very many French soldiers as well, by the greatest muddling through ever, that it came to have the same morale boosting effect as many victories and has been remembered as a triumph.
Meanwhile, in far away Berala I slept on! And grew up to think it IMPOSSIBLE that we would do anything but WIN the War!
DUNKIRK -ABANDONED MILITARY EQUIPMENT |
DUNKIRK - CHAOTIC BUT SUCCESSFUL EVACUATION |
DUNKIRK - POSTAGE STAMPS - DEFEAT INTO TRIUMPH |
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
SHOWING HER AGE....THE TIME FINALLY ARRIVED
You can't say I didn't warn you this was coming. At last it was decided we could not go on the way things were......and then......and then the opportunity arose!
AN INVITATION
Monday, November 14, 2011
BRIGHT HOPES FOR OUR FUTURE
Sacred Heart School seen from the Porch of the church. |
BRIGHT HOPES
FOR THE FUTURE
Last Thursday,
I had the privilege and pleasure of speaking to the students of both Year One
Classes at Sacred Heart School in our suburb on Sydney's North Shore.
My Granddaughter had been asked to volunteer a Grandparent to speak to
the combined classes about life when he/she was the same age as the children
are now. Six years old - and how far away 1946 seems to me - but it is only 65
years ago, so I was glad to have the opportunity to see what these little Australians
are like as an audience.
So, after
attending 9.00am Mass at Sacred Heart Church on the Feast of Saint Leo the
Great, I headed up the path to the school to the Reception and Office. I was
duly signed in and pleasantly welcomed, but carefully cautioned that if I
needed to "use the facilities" I should not use the children's
Toilets!!Well, in 1946 no such caution would have been deemed necessary to a
visitor. Though I greeted the caution with a laugh, in truth, I found it a
distasteful reflection of how far we have slid down the path of the Nanny
State, and the witless fear of "something going wrong". Enough of
that. The Office staff phoned Mrs. S, my Granddaughter's Teacher and she sent her and her best friend along to escort me to the Classroom. This they did in fine
style, proudly pointing out the various features of the school as we went.
As we passed
the Hall, Emily stopped to wave to her Mum, my daughter , who with other
Mothers was supervising a pre-schoolers play group. Her mother’s return wave and warm smile sent us
on our way. Arriving at the classroom, I found about 40 little Australians of a
wide range of national and racial backgrounds sitting in orderly fashion and
well behaved, on the carpeted floor of their colorful Classroom. Mrs. S was there and then Mr.H the Teacher of the second half of Year One joined
us. Mrs. S introduced me and reminded the children of the background -
their project to learn what life was like for their Grandparents. And so, I
launched into my presentation.
Firstly, I
told them that we would talk about my School in 1946, then about my home and food,
then about going "out”, then about transport, then about entertainment, about the
world as it was and about the latest things then available. And lastly but most
importantly we would talk about the Church.
I told the
children that I knew that their least favourite word would be "No"
and I apologized in advance for the fact that I would have to use it a lot! I
asked them to close their eyes and imagine their homes with:
No: TELEVISION
COMPUTER
INTERNET
TELEPHONES
REFRIGERATORS
DISH WASHER
WASHING MACHINE
DRYER
HOT WATER SYSTEM
CARPET
AIR CONDITIONING
FLUSHING TOILET
Already the
chorus of groans, and "But how did you...." and "That's
terrible..." and more had started before I asked them to now open their
eyes. I explained that although some of those things existed, we did not have
any of them, nor did our relatives, friends or neighbors.
My home in Berala from my 1940 birth until my 1970 Marriage. |
To explain how
we "survived" such fearful deprivation, I told them of the importance
of the Radio, in its black wooden cabinet which stood on the floor and rose to
about table height, and it's tiny dial and large speaker covered by a cloth
screen. My habit of sitting on the floor close to the Radio, listening to
"Canadian Pacific”, The Goon Show (some had heard of it and knew of Peter
Sellars and Spike Milligan).
We talked
about how the non-existence of the Internet meant relying on books, the Library
and the newspapers and the absence of Email meant relying on the mail, which
was delivered twice a day. Without computers we used handwritten letters, and
much more often paid visits to those we wanted to communicate with.
The lack of
refrigerators was covered by the Ice Box and we discussed the replacement of
its block of ice once a week in cool weather or twice a week in hot weather.
The lack of a hot water service meant my poor Mum having to carry large
containers of hot water from the gas stove to the bathroom, for my bath. Later
years brought first of all a gas heater at the end of the bath and later still
the true hot water service.
The absence of
carpet was made good by linoleum which Mr. H helpfully pointed out was
somewhat similar to a nearby patch of vinyl flooring, though not so flexible
and durable.
The absence of
the flushing toilet meant trips to the "little house “in the backyard and weekly visits
from the sanitary service to remove and replace the container- an unpleasant
subject!!
We moved on to
more pleasing matters with the subject of food. Because of the War, food was
rationed and people carefully managed their ration cards. They would save
ration stamps which came in a Bank Book sized card so that they could have
enough for special occasions such as Birthday Cakes etc. Rationing reduced the
demand for transport of non-essential goods and especially of shipping from
overseas. Everything was made to serve the idea of winning the War.
There was no
chocolate! Cries of HORROR from the kinder! What chocolate there was was kept
for the sailors, soldiers and airmen. But we had a next door neighbor who used
to have dealings with the soldiers (I never found out what or why) and he would
trade goods for their chocolate rations and give them to me.
Our milk was
delivered each day from the Dairy by the milkman in his horse-drawn cart with
its glass-lined tank. He would take our Billy Can and the money from our front
verandah and leave the milk there early in the morning.
The Baker also
delivered fresh, hot bread from his little pre-War red Ford Van. Only two types
existed square and round top! There was no sliced bread, it was strictly do-it-yourself!
Bread was delivered every day except Sunday.
The food we
ate was all very recognizable to-day:
Breakfast -
Corn Flakes/Porridge
Boiled Eggs or Scrambled
Eggs on Toast
Toast with Jam or Honey
Lunch - Sandwiches cut in triangles with
Devon/Roast Beef/
Corned Beef (LUNCH was called DINNER)
Tea - Sausages/Rissoles/Roast Beef/Roast
Lamb/ Steak
Vegetables: Carrots,
Cabbage, Cauliflower, Potatoes, Onions
(but no Broccoli or
Brussels Sprouts etc. which only came
To be available as a result
of post War immigration. We
Called those immigrants
"New Australians".) Tea is of
course, now called
"Dinner"!
For dessert we
would often have deep sponge .cakes halved and filled with cream or “mock cream" with jam. After the
War, ice cream became available in shallow cardboard packs known as
"bricks"(a brick of ice cream).
The flavor was Vanilla - later “rainbow ice cream: vanilla, chocolate,
strawberry began the flood of various ice cream treats.
Take away food
as an idea started with Chinese take away Restaurants. Again, the Billy Can was
pressed into service. But there had always been a number of Hamburger and Fish
and Chip Shops often combined in the one location. When I was very little three
pence (written 3d and pronounced "thrippence"or if you were English
"thrip pence") bought a good sized bag of chips. Then, to our horror
the price doubled in one jump to sixpence (6d that is from 2 1/2 cents to 5
cents in to-day's money).
Five Pound Note - the equivalent of Ten Dollars |
Our money in
those days was Pounds, Shillings and Pence: Dollars and Cents were American. It
did not seem worthwhile to burden the kinder with the intricacies of Pounds,
Shillings and Pence - they might have thought we were all quite silly!
When speaking
of my school, Saint Peter Chanel's Convent School, it became necessary to
explain "Nuns" to the kinder- because we had no lay teachers not one!
I told them of the Nuns decision to serve Our Lord alone and to give up
everything shown by wearing their religious habit (which I reminded the little
ones, they had seen in picture of Saint Mary of the Cross Mackillop". This
produced unanimous nods of agreement. I told them how the Nuns were so
completely dedicated to
Serving Our
Lord that they gave up there name and adopted a name in religion. Such names as
Sister Austin (an old English form of Augustine) and Sister Christina served to
give them examples.
I told them
what a very happy time I spent there, with the huge playing fields, and how I
used to walk twenty minutes each way to and from school.
I told the
kinder that we used to say Prayers at the beginning of each day, before Lunch
and at the end of each School day. I was able to circulate among them a 1975
copy of the green Catechism we had originally used to learn by heart.
I told them
about our uniform of dark blue shorts, blue shirts and black boucle ties with
multiple pairs of horizontal gold stripes.
I had worn a
boucle tie to show the type of material. One little fellow realized that it was
made out of silk! Later I told them that I had gone on to Marist Brothers
Lidcombe and Darlinghurst.
Finally I told
them what great fun we had setting up the Church/School for Sunday Mass. This
was done at the close of school each Friday, and the boys would push open the
very high and heavy folding doors that divided up the classrooms and then, five
or six at a time, run the pews down to
the front of the building as fast as we could AFTER we had swept the whole
building clean. What fun and a great way to start the weekend!
When it came
to going "out" we had no Shopping Centre or Malls and for that
matter, no Supermarkets either! Our shopping needs were met by groups of
"corner shops" a Grocer, a Greengrocer and a Butcher. In bigger
suburbs, there would be a Delicatessen, a Ham and Beef Shop and shops for all
sewing and dressmaking requirements,jewellers shops and gift shops, and even
electrical goods shops (though the range of goods was MUCH smaller than to-day.
Then I told
the kinder how once a week during holiday time I used to go into town - the
City - with my Mum and Dad if he was not on shift work. Or, as an alternative
we sometimes went to Burwood. These were always interesting trips to me, seeing
more and more of the world.
Greatest of the Manly Ferries - S.S. SOUTH STEYNE |
When we went
to the Beach we travelled by train and then ferry to Manly our favorite beach.
I loved the trip on the ferry, especially as we crossed between the Heads where
the ocean swell always caused the ferry to pitch and roll a bit or a great deal
depending on the weather. I loved looking down into the engine room of the
steam powered ferries because of the smell of oil and steam, and the heat and
the sight of the great pistons and rods turning the cranks in the propeller
shaft. An added bonus on the trip was a packet of SMITHS POTATO CRISPS whose
salty taste seemed to complement the salt smell of the Harbour seawater.
Sometimes I
would go with friends across the Street to their favorite family beach at
Bronte. This involved traveling by train to Central Station then down to the
trams which travelled out to Bronte via Bondi Junction.
The typical tram of the day - straight out of the 1920's or even earlier perhaps. |
About once a
year there used to be a Parish Picnic usually by Bus to the Royal National
Park. These were good days with the extended family and Parish friends.
Transport in
our local area was by private bus- normally quite old and rather noisy and
bumpy. Trains were mostly electric, ALL single deckhand painted a dull red with
a gold stripe under the windows. There were still some steam trains from outer
western and South Western suburbs- I loved them- they always seemed
"alive" in some way.
We had no
cars, not our family, friends, neighbors or relatives. They were too expensive
and few people knew how to drive. After a few years the older children in
families left work, saved enough money and bought second hand cars, this was
the case for my older Brother.
Banks had no
ATMs. They opened between 10 am and 3pm, and 9.30 am and 12.00 pm on Saturdays-
during which time they were very crowded. Most tellers we're men about 35 years
old - it was thought one needed to be about that age to be trusted with the money.
Banks were made to look solid and serious places so that people would feel
confident about depositing their savings with them. The more important Banks,
in the City for example, we're built to be very strong, with heavy brass doors
and high windows with metal grills over them - to make the Banks safe from
attack. People still had in their minds the "run" on the Banks in
1929 at the beginning of the Great Depression. I explained to the children that
people became very worried about the Banks and all went to ask for their money
back. I explained that Banks COULD NOT give everyone their money back at once
because they lend it out to other people over periods of years. Banks only keep
say 10 to 15 per cent of their total deposits in cash to meet withdrawal needs.
So, I said, when you take your money to the Bank to deposit it they do not lock
it away and say “that is "Mary's money"! Toward the back of the
room one young gentleman's hand shot up like a rocket and goggle eyed he said
"They do with MY money!!!" I carefully assured him that he was Wong
and explained as simply as possible why it could not be done any other way.
Subdued, but deeply sceptical about Banks, he went along with what I had said.
I went on to
talk about the world as we knew it when I was little. Firstly, the rest of it
was a long way away. Few travelled overseas but the wealthy. Ships were the
least expensive, but they took 6weeks to reach England. Aeroplanes were VERY
expensive and took 2or3days to reach England allowing for stop overs to refuel
on multiple occasions.
The War just
finished in 1945, was the one thing that united everyone and still dominated
everyone's attitudes, thoughts and ideas. The only thing to rival it in the
minds of those old enough was the Great Depression (1929 to 1939) in which one
man in three was unemployed. The memory of this made people who lived through it,
like my parents, ultra cautious about money, about debt and about saving.
The War increased
Australia's friendship with the United States , which really saved us from
Japanese invasion, and, at the same time, it diminished our ties with England,
which had put Australia in a second rank of priority for most assistance. People
remembered and resented that, although as time passed it became less of an
issue.
Now we dealt
with the most important thing - the Church - most important why? Yes, I told
the children, because it was given to us BY GOD HIMSELF.
Leading the People and concentrating on God
Mass in those
days was said I Latin with the Priest mostly leading the People facing the
Altar all of them concentrating on God Who made us all and Who made EVERYTHING
that exists. It had been this way for about 1,600 years and before that, back
to Our Lord's time it had been said in Greek which everyone used at that time.
The Tabernacle
was fixed on the Altar, at its very centre, so that the focus of everyone's
attention was always Our Blessed Lord in the Tabernacle in the Blessed
Sacrament. The Church was FULL for three
Masses every Sunday and it was most often "Standing Room Only".
I especially
loved the Procession to the Altar of Repose on Holy Thursday. Love for Our Lord
in the Blessed Sacrament filled my heart and mind since I was about seven years
old.
The “latest things" in those days were.
Bakelite and plastics, I explained both to the littlies, with plenty of
examples. Not long after that would come pizza, which we first heard about in a
song sung by Dean Martin “when the Moon hits your eye, like a big pizza pie...” That took a bit of explaining. Then
Coca Cola came back for the first time since the War began and then NEW cars
started appearing on the streets - wow! Everyone was excited about that and
many felt they could now afford one! A little bit later in 1956 came Black and
White Television and then Widescreen Movies.
I sought to
fix in the children's minds that very many things change and that change is
constant. But some things never change, and the principal one is God Himself always,
all powerful, loving and good.
I asked them
to be always confident in themselves, because God Himself had chosen to make
each one of them and He has a purpose for them as He does for each of us. So
they are special to God and He will help them to find their special purpose in
life as long as they do what is right and good and try their very best.
Mrs. S and Mr.H then invited the children to ask me questions. A forest of eager
hands went up. The questions were all very good and intelligent. However one
amazed me and the teachers as well. A very quiet young girl near the front of
the group fixed me with a steady look and a sympathetic smile:
"With all
that change, what did you find the most difficult to deal with?”!!! What had we here? A true child
psychologist?
It was a
seriously intended and thoughtful question way beyond her years. I thought
carefully and then told her it was the changes in the Mass. I found it very
difficult to accept the idea of the Priest looking at me when he is praying to
God. And I missed the noble Latin which I could always follow from my Missal
She nodded sagely, and I was surprised to notice a number of others also nodding in agreement.
As I said to them : if I am looking at you, what am I doing - I am gesturing
and projecting an image, performing to impress you -but the Priest's attention
and ours should be on God.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)