Showing posts with label FRENCH. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FRENCH. Show all posts

Saturday, December 21, 2019

SOME THINGS IN COMMON Part IIa



Early Colonial Painting

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

AUSTRALIA

The Earliest occupants of Australia we can establish were the Aboriginal people. They lived a nomadic existence, with no settled towns or villages, some customary places for rituals, some rock art, stone axes and arrow tips and spearheads and dug-out canoes. Accommodation was bark lean-tos. There was no "Government" in any civilised sense and no clothing except loin coverings at times -bark or hides, and hides used for warmth. There was no farming or grazing. Hunting and gathering was the rule and prevented any significant advance in their society, in this generally harsh environment. Upon their first contacts with Europeans who arrived in their sailing ships, they are said to have regarded the ships as something like birds, and their strange, pale occupants as either spirits or "gods" of some sort. In time, they came to value some of the possessions of these creatures, especially those for which they had a use - knives, axes.and the like. (N.B. Of late, this classical assessment of the facts has become touched by controversy. A man named Bruce Pascoe, who has made varied claims about being of indigenous ancestry, and has won an Award as an indigenous author, has written a book entitled "Dark Emu" in which he claims that Aboriginal Australians, far from being "hunter-gatherers" were accomplished farmers and fishing experts as well as bakers and the originators of democratic national Government. unfortunately for him, his rather surprising claims are based on his account of what is contained in the published reports of colonial explorers Charles Sturt and Thomas Mitchell. His references to these works have been shown to be, inter alia "egregious deception". Not only that but his own claims - varied as they are, to be of Aboriginal ancestry have been shown to be baseless since professional genealogy has traced his ancestry on paternal and maternal sides back to........ENGLAND! The matter has been thoroughly examined in the website:https://www.dark-emu-exposed.org/ And is further concisely demolished in the book "Bitter Harvest: The Illusion of Aboriginal Agriculture in Bruce Pascoe's Dark Emu"https://quadrant.org.au/product/bitter-harvest/)


The numbers of Aboriginal people at the time of European arrival can never be known, but the general consensus seems to be that there might have several hundred thousand over the entire continent. But if that were so, one might have expected very much more extensive contact than actually occurred.

European exploration could have begun as early as the 1500s. In 1515 the Portugese arrived in Timor and in 1515 Portugese Dominican Friars established a mission there. 

Timor is only 610 Kilometres from Australia. It beggars belief that, having come around the mighty coast of Africa and across the Indian Ocean, they would not have tried to reach the fabled "Great South Land of The Holy Spirit" which their maps conjectured must exist -just to balance up the Globe! 

There was a complicating factor to consider before talking about any such activity: the Treaty of Zaragoza complementing the Treaty of Tordesillas,  in dividing up the world between Catholic Spain and Catholic Portugal , by the Bull of Pope Alexander VI with demarcation lines passing through the Pacific and part of Australia, and the Atlantic respectively. Whilst Timor was just in the Portugese sphere of influence, the most fertile and attractive part of Australia as it was to become known, was in the Spanish sphere. It would not have been in the relative interests of Portugal to make known anything it had discovered in the "Spanish sphere of influence."

The great fire and tsunami which destroyed the Royal Library of Portugal in Lisbon on All Souls Day 1755 - following a massive Earthquake -   destroyed any records of such exploration which we might have hoped to find. The only possible clue is the wreck of a "mahogany ship" which is reputed to appear and disappear in shifting sands in Armstrong Bay in South Western Victoria. Despite three Symposia on the subject, no conclusion has been reached.

Then, the Protestants got the idea that they would make an effort to find this "Terra Australis".



Willem Janzsoon
The first of these folk seems to have been a Dutchman Willem Janszoon who, in the ship DUYFKEN of the Dutch East India Company, sailed into the Gulf of Carpentaria in 1606 and made landfall on the Western  Shore of Cape York in what is now the State of Queensland. 

 This is the first recorded European landfall on the Australian mainland.He charted 320km of the coastline, thinking he was recording the Southern coast of New Guinea. The land was swampy and ten of his men were killed by hostile natives, so he abandoned the unpromising expedition. He returned to Australia in July 1618 and landed on what is now believed to have been North West Cape of W.A. - he assumed it was an island without attempting to circumnavigate it.


THIS REPLICA OF DUYFKEN IS A REGULAR VISITOR TO AUSTRALIA

Shortly after Janzsoon's landfall in the Gulf of Carpentaria, a Portugese working in the Spanish Navy, Luis Vaz de Torres sailed through the Strait that now bears his name, proving that New Guinea was in fact not connected to Terra Australis.

Dirk Hartog (there are several spellings of both names) (1580-1621) was the next of the Dutchmen. He commanded a Dutch East India Company vessel and in 1616 landed on what is now called Dirk Hartog Island off Shark Bay 800 Kms North of present-day Perth W.A. and the most Westerly point of the Australian mainland. Hartog found "nothing of interest"!

Another Dutchman Frederik de Houteman turned up near Perth W.A.in 1619 but nothing came of that. Then in 1628, there occurred a singular and dramatic contact - the Dutch East India Company's brand new ship "BATAVIA" Commanded by Arianen Jacobsz was wrecked on the W.A. Coast on Morning Reef near Beacon Island part of the Houtman Abrolhos. This was a major event which is very well documented in books, magazines and even a TV Documentary. Of her 322 Passengers and Crew, 40 were drowned and 282 survived for a time. However, a bloody mutiny took place and at least 100 people died in the process. A rescue ship from Batavia was sent out to find BATAVIA. The story gets incredibly complex with further murders, trials, executions and, in the end, only 68 people returned to Batavia.



REPLICA OF THE BATAVIA
In 1642 another Dutchman Abel Tasman ( 1603-1659) of the Dutch East India Company discovered Tasmania (the Island State South of the now Australian mainland, as well as New Zealand and Fiji.  He returned on a second voyage in 1644 and named the mainland "New Holland".

Some measure of relief from this flood of Dutchmen was provided in 1688 when the English adventurer William Dampier arrived in King Sound W.A. He had already had quite an interesting life sailing in merchant vessels to Newfoundland and to Java before joining the Royal Navy in 1673. He fought in two battles against the Dutch but was invalided out after a catastrophic illness. For several years he did various activities in Jamaica and Mexico. But in 1679 he fell in with the Buccaneer Captain Bartholomew Sharp on the Spanish Main of Central America and was involved in a series of piratical activities which resulted in a circumnavigation of the globe. In 1683 a privateer (British licensed Pirate in effect) John Cooke engaged Dampier to round Cape Horn and raid Spanish possessions in Pacific South America. At its peak, this successful adventure consisted of ten ships. Cooke died and the Pirate crew elected Captain Charles Swan to take his place in command of the CYGNET which Dampier joined. They sailed on, raiding Spanish possessions in the Asian Pacific area. In 1688 Dampier was commanding a second privateer ship when he anchored in Shark Bay W.A.  After many hazardous adventures, Dampier returned to England with the journals of his goings-on and a tattooed slave whom he exhibited on a travelling exhibition whilst his journals were being printed.
WILLIAM DAMPIER

His book " A New Voyage Around the World" was a publishing sensation even attracting Admiralty interest. In 1699 he was given command of H.M.S. ROEBUCK a 26 Gun Frigate and a mission to explore the East Coast of what the Dutch had named New Holland (now Australia). Travelling via the Cape of Good Hope (it was too late in the sailing season to attempt Cape Horn) he returned to Shark Bay in August 1699. From there he sought to follow the coast North East but ended up North of New Guinea and out into the Bismarck Archipelago of Pacific Islands. ROEBUCK was by now in very poor condition and though he was in fact only 100 Kms from the East Coast of New Holland he was forced to turn back. The ship foundered at Ascension Island in February 1701. Dampier and his crew were rescued by an East Indiaman and reached England in August 1701. He was Court Martialled for cruelty to one of his officers and found guilty.   Subsequently, he was given another naval command and fought against the Spanish until finishing his service in 1707. In 1708 he was again engaged as a Privateer and circumnavigated the globe for a third time, but died in 1715 in substantial debt.

The Dutch were to have one last fling in this direction when, in 1696 - three years before Dampier's last visit to Shark Bay, Willem de Vlamingh visited what is now called Dirk Hartog Island and found the Pewter Plate Hartog had left as a record of his discovery.

93YEARS OF DISCOVERY

We see then, an intense period of exploration from 1606 to 1699 - 93 years of people, mostly Dutch, seeking commercial advantage out of finding and exploiting -if possible - the "Great South Land" all of which came to nothing.

It is interesting to note that there was never any attempt to take slaves from Australia. (Though we shall later see that there was for a time a cruel trade in importing "Kanaka" supposedly indentured labour from the Pacific Islands.) The absence of any such slave trade seems to reflect two factors - no great numbers of natives in evidence and /or natives thought unlikely to be saleable. I doubt that it was moral virtue on the part of the explorers, as the Dutch were actively involved in the African slave trade at the expense of the Portugese.

But the high point of Dutch maritime and trading influence was reached in the late 1600s. The expanding influence of England and her Royal Navy over time saw the Dutch Empire repeatedly under attack and still later the French assisted in that process. Colonies were lost, regained, lost again, regained in a bewildering series of wars, treaties and international mayhem. But at the end of it, all the vitality of the Dutch Empire was diminished and that of the British Empire was on the rise.

UNDERSTANDING WHAT IT WAS ABOUT

We have observed the trade obsessed Dutch coming to see what the Great South Land had to offer - not much for their tastes! Not even decent slaves. For the Spanish no overly-obvious Gold. Who is up next?

In the ensuing years, the French, arguably builders of the finest and fastest fighting ships of the days of sail, and quite fine sailors were pre-occupied with domestic political issues. Philosophical considerations arising out of the so-called Enlightenment, fed into civil dissatisfaction arising from years of bad French harvests in the mid-1700s and the national financial burdens following the 7 Years War ending in 1763 (fought against a coalition of the British, Prussians and Portugese), and involvement in the American War of Independence against the English. All of this culminated in 1789 in the French Revolution.

Despite all of the turmoil, and more still to come, in the subsequent Napoleonic Revolution, the French did maintain some exploration activity. In 1756 the King - Louis XV -  had despatched de Bougainville to look for the Great South Land. However, after reaching South America and the Falklands, de Bougainville and his crew of 400 Frenchmen found themselves in Tahiti surrounded by hundreds of canoes laden with Polynesian beauties and tarried for a while finally claiming Tahiti for France.  It is believed that he almost encountered the Great Barrier Reef on Australia's East Coast and he turned North to avoid being dashed against the rocks. He ended up in the Pacific Islands, his crew suffering from Scurvy and had to head for safety in Batavia in the Dutch East Indies before heading home.

In 1772 King Louis XV had sent two further exploratory missions, one led by Dufresne who actually did some exploration on Tasmania and had contact with the native people there for a few days. After some of his crew were killed by New Zealand Maori warriors he retreated to Mauritius.  The two ships constituting the second expedition became separated in a severe storm and one returned home, The other, commanded by de St.Alouarn sighted Cape Leeuwin in W.A. and sailed North to Shark Bay of Dutch and Dampier fame. 

The French expeditions were characterised by a distinctly scientific character in their staffing - a fact which has left us a rich fund of journals, charts and illustrated scientific works.

Enter the English

"Perfidious Albion" is the insult often hurled at the English in international affairs. One of the early uses of a similar phrase was by the great French Bishop and Preacher /Theologian Jacques-Benigne Bossuet who referred in a famous sermon to " L'Angleterre, ah, la perfide Angleterre" ("England ah treacherous England"). 
Lieutenant James Cook R.N.
Captain of H.M.Bark Endeavour

(he later achieved the Rank of Captain.)

In the case of the mission of Captain James Cook R.N. and the Bark ENDEAVOUR, the description was well-justified. Ostensibly, the mission was intended to observe the transit of Venus from Tahiti. He left in 1768 and arrived in Tahiti after rounding Cape Horn, in 1769.  But he had other orders - he was to find and examine the east coast of the Great South Land.  

Cook was already a renowned Navigator and Cartographer since his youngest days in Canada fighting the French. He found the South-East corner of the Australian Continent on 20th April 1770 and sailed northward up the East Coast identifying the good harbour of Botany Bay which he named, making the first landfall on 29th April 1770. He later observed a little to the North but did not enter, the majestic harbour now known as Sydney Harbour which Cook noted could readily accommodate 100 Ships of the Line at anchor. Far on to the North on the Queensland Coast, his ship ran aground, but he got her off, careened her at what is now Cooktown to effect repairs, then completed his mission via Batavia, and the Cape of Good Hope - a circumnavigation achieved.   
The British goal at this stage was not trade, but a military penal settlement on the Great South Land and then to see what would evolve.  

Cook's own published report and those of the well-connected Sir Joseph Banks - Botanist and Member of the Royal Society - excited great interest in popular and official circles. American Independence denied England her Penal Colonies in America. Cook's discovery acquired fresh interest. He was sent on a second mission from 1772-1775 to define the limits of the Great South Land as far as possible. A third mission from 1776 - 1780 completed the task in greater detail but sadly resulted in the death of Captain Cook in Hawaii, after retrieving some valuable instruments stolen by the natives there.

Not only a brilliant Navigator and Cartographer, Captain Cook was a prudent, thorough professional who paid very careful attention to the health of his crews. Only in the last stages of his onerous third voyage can one detect some fraying of his judgement of issues and events under the great strain of years of command at the extremities of the Earth.


H.M.BARK ENDEAVOUR REPLICA

In 1787 Captain Arthur Phillip R.N. and his Fleet of ships containing convicts, soldiers and supplies had set out, and they arrived in Botany Bay in mid-January, 1788 to set up a Penal Colony.  Phillip determined that the better location would be Sydney Cove, now in Sydney Harbour but a severe gale delayed the move until 26th January 1788 - giving us the annual date of AUSTRALIA DAY.
Early French depictions of Australian Aboriginals were captive to the the popular ideal of "the noble savage"  - the idea that if only there had been no "civilisation" Man would have developed in an ideal social and physical state. It was as unrealistic as the early English paintings in Australia featuring soft Northern Hemisphere light and gentle landscapes
Amazingly here at the end of the world two French ships under the command of La Perouse arrived two days earlier on 24th January. Polite , even good relations developed between the two groups, with exchanges of visits and mutual assistance with supplies. La Perouse did not sail away until 10th March and before he did he committed to the British some of his Journals and Charts which were subsequently published in France. La Perouse and his ships were never seen again. 

The last words attributed to King Louis XVI before he was guillotined in the course of the Revolution were: " Is there any word of M.de La Perouse?" Poignant indeed, within moments of his own cruel death.


The whole pattern of English early settlement in Australia whether on the mainland or in Tasmania or offshore on the infamous Norfolk Island,  was one of military administration of a Penal Colony. It was left to the few free settlers,  freed convicts and discharged soldiers to pursue and develop trade in their own interests. It would be some time before the "Mother Land" awoke to the trading potential of the "good for nothing but convicts", Colony.

SUMMING IT UP

In reviewing all of this history, I have come to a new appreciation of the energy and enterprise of the few free, and many more freed convicts who, in their own interests, developed what became Australia. The Dutch and Spanish had no use for it, the English Government saw it fit only as a Penal Colony. The newly-freed men and women saw it as their home (after a time) and cherished the freedom and climate it provided. No longer the grim misery of class-ridden , gloomy Georgian England but rather the bright sunshine, limitless land, fresh air and promising prospects beckoned them to try to make a new life, to find a new way. And, strangely, it was the very efficiency of the British administration that made it all achievable - military security, civil law, and frequent sound Government gave them what they could never achieve at "Home" in England. 

Those born in Australia came to proudly call themselves "Cabbage Tree Hat Lads" for the hats they wove out of the Cabbage Tree foliage. It was a neat contrast to the English -born "Pommies" - a derogatory term of uncertain origin but said to have referred to their ruddy complexions (like the pomegranate) .

To come from this unpromising beginning to be the 13th largest economy in the World and the 24th largest Exporting Nation in the World is nothing short of remarkable.


SYDNEY COVE 1791
Through all this, she remained Capital poor - debt was essential to development. 

Australia has become a lucky country, yet she suffers a serious lack of freshwater and an almost total lack of oil. But, unknown to those early exploring European powers, she concealed vast treasures of gold, silver, copper, zinc, diamonds, coal, natural gas, iron ore, alumina, bauxite, and with careful husbandry the capacity to produce enormous crops of wheat, and other grains, sugar,  fruit and vegetables and to produce vast quantities of very fine wines and dairy products as well as wool from sheep and meat from sheep and cattle, that awaited only the development of refrigerated shipping. More recently that same industry and resourcefulness have made her the educator of hundreds of thousands of students from Asia, and an active participant in international aid programmes and co-operative defense initiatives. It is a continuing and impressive story.

THE NEXT STAGE

In Part II b. I shall look at the awesome historical background of the other great country - Nigeria - looking for any common factors, similarities and dissimilarities. What, if anything, can be understood from looking at the two countries experience side by side?

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

AFRICA TWELFTH STOP NIGER

NIGER

AFRICA

BACKGROUND :

Africa covers 6 per cent of the surface of the Earth and provides 20.4 per cent of Earth’s landmass.   Occupying this massive  and significant territory there are 1.1 Billion people. Africa is the second largest and second most populous continent on Earth.


NIGER

The Republic of Niger is yet another land-locked African country. It is bordered to the North by Algeria and Libya, to the  East by Chad, to the South East by Lake Chad and to the South by Nigeria and Benin and to the South West by Burkina Faso and to the West by Mali.

Niger is the 22nd largest country in the World, being about 1/6th the size of Australia.It is the 60th most populous country in the World with 19.26 million people( Australia 52nd with 23.8 millions).

The great FACT about Niger is that 80% of its land area is part of the Sahara Desert. The population is therefore concentrated in the South.The people are predominantly Mohammedan.Niger ranks 187th in the United Nations " Human Development Index", it is thus shown to be an underdeveloped nation.

The country's history since it won independence from France in 1958 has been turbulent and it is now into its 7th Republic that history includes 4 Military Regimes.

The economy is largely based on subsistence agriculture . However, there are limited exports to surrounding countries - such foreign exchange earnings as there are come from food and cattle - all unprocessed, save for some hides and skins and handicrafts.There are also mining and oil exports.The former have prominently featured uranium exports. A little more than one fifth of the roads in the country are paved. 574 Kilometres of railway are being built to connect the capital Niamey to Parakou in neighbouring Benin is due to be completed by 2016.

The history of Niger's territory is long and varied, with human habitation dating back to 5,000 B.C. But it was the period around 500 B.C. before substantial activity can be identified, and this seems related to the trans Saharan trade routes. This also led to the introduction of the Mohammedan religion. From A.D. 600 to 1591 the Songhai Empire ruled and this became Mohammedan after the Mohammedan wars of expansion began around A.D. 700. From the mid 14th Century the Songhai were displaced by the various Mohammedan Hausa Kingdoms which multiplied throughout  the region.

In this period also there were intrusions by the Mali Empire and the Kanem - Bornu Empire.

Following the notorious 1885 Berlin Conference in which the European Powers decided on how Africa should be carved up for the purposes of colonisation, the French set-up what became known as the Voulet - Chanoine Mission to explore the possibilities in the Chad Basin and to unify all French territories in West Africa. It set out from Senegal in 1898. Nine Europeans led the Mission which was composed of an aggregation of some 1,300 men - 800 of whom were porters. The two leading men, Voulet and Chanoine were , to say the least of an unstable psychological make-up (the term psychopaths has been used by a  British historian). In fact it seems that they were callous and even blood-thirsty. armed with artillery, machine guns , hundreds of rifles and millions of rounds of ammunition, and led by such characters the worst could be expected. They came to reject orders from Paris and proceeded in a scandalous manner. The expedition was adversely effected by scarcity of supplies in the region and an outbreak of dysentery which soon killed 148 of the porters. Voulet's troops proceeded pillaging, raping, looting and killing.On 8th January, 1899 they attacked a village and killed 101 people including 30 women and children - to set an example for the region, after a couple of his soldiers were wounded in a fray! In May the same year in a similar reprisal he led his men in the massacre of another village in which it seems thousands were killed - on account of the earlier killing of 4 of his soldiers.

Some months before one of Voulet's Officers had resigned - disgusted at the slaughtering , he returned to Franc and wrote a detailed account of the first massacre which via his fiancee got into the hands of the Government Minister responsible. He promptly ordered the Governor of Timbuktu , Governor Klobb, to take control and arrest Voulet. Klobb set out with 50 troops and a French Officer.  

After travelling 2,000 Kms in pursuit of the villains, Klobb received reports he was very close to them and sent ahead A Sergeant and two soldiers demanding Voulet's immediate return to Paris, In his reply Voulet reminded Klobb that he had 600 guns against Klobb's 50 and declined to obey. He and Chanoine were careful to keep Klobb's letter from the other French Officers. He kept on raiding and on July 13 after a villager killed one of his men, he massacred 150 women and children at another village. He sent a second letter to Klobb warning him to come no closer.

Klobb came on. Voulet ordered his own men to fall back so that they would not know the true nature of Klobb's mission. Klobb proceeded boldly on his own , whilst wearing his Legion d'Honneur  - Voulet insisted he stop, but Klobb ordered those with Voulet to be loyal to their duty. Voulet ordered them to fire a warning volley in the air , but as Klobb kept coming he ordered him to be shot. He fell dead after having ordered his troops not to return fire. They in fact fled.

Voulet and Chanoine tried to rally their men in the coming days , to help them set up their own "kingdom" abandoning French association altogether. Within a few days both were dead at the hands of the troops. In due course, under other officers, despite much strife, order was restored and the original mission was completed in a civilised manner( as much as that can be said for dispossessing people of their independence and property.) 

Ultimately it was decided by the Ministry of Colonies in Paris that the outrages committed under the direction of Voulet and Chanoine were due to a "Sudanese sickness and the dreadful heat sending the two mad."


 

Saturday, January 24, 2015

AFRICA - THIRD STOP - TUNISIA




TUNISIA





















Background:

Africa covers 6 per cent of the surface of the Earth and provides 20.4 per cent of Earth’s landmass. Occupying this massive and significant territory there are 1.1 Billion people. Africa is the second largest and second most populous continent on Earth.

TUNISIA

The Northernmost country in Africa, and the smallest  in its region (the Mahgreb) Tunisia also contains two of the three points in Africa closest to Europe - the closest is not in Tunisia and is opposite Gibraltar.

Historically, its existence has been an ancient but  turbulent one, due to its position and internal geography.Tunisia has a Mediterranean coastline of 1,148 Kilometres which begins running West to East before sharply turning South in one of the distinctive features of the African coastline.Nestled within this area we find the capital Tunis and also the ruins of ancient Carthage. The internal geography is notable for the including the Eastern end of the Atlas Mountains and the Northern reaches of the Sahara Desert but much of the rest of the territory is fertile soil.

The population of Tunisia is approx. 10,800,000.


We can trace the origins of Tunisia back to the Berber tribes which were the principal inhabitants.However in about the 12th Century B.C., the Phoenicians established a trading settlement on the coast, and in the 9th Century B.C. the Phoenicians and some Cypriots established the city of Carthage.  The culture and religion of the city was Phoenician.The "gods" worshipped were Baal and Tanet. Through trading and war, especially with settlements in Sicily, Carthage progressively became the most important power in the Southern Mediterranean.

This growth of Cathaginian muscle brought Carthage into conflict with Rome which viewed itself as the natural pre-eminent power in the region.The First Punic War 264 B.C. - 241 B.C. had been fought over Sicily and Corsica and was won decisively by the Romans.

Briefly - to cover a near cataclysmic period in Roman history : Carthage invaded what is now Spain in 237 B.C. Under Hamilcar Barca. But he died in 230/229 B.C.  His sons Hannibal and Hasdrubal respectively prosecuted and developed plans for the conquest of the whole of the peninsula. So strong was their situation that the Romans concluded a treaty with them, demarcating their borders of influence. In 221 B.C. Hasdrubal was assassinated  and the troops elected Hannibal to take political control as well as his military control. In 219 B.C. the people of Saguntum (Carthaginian control) appealed to Rome for protection from the Carthaginian treatment of them. ( Sounds familiar? : Danzig/Gdansk and the Nazis, and Ukraine to-day?)  This resulted in the Second Punic War 218-211 B.C. 
                                                                  HANNIBAL BARCA
On this occasion Hannibal ( and his Elephants!) crossed the Alps and invaded Italy. He repeatedly inflicted heavy to very heavy defeats on the Roman forces sent to stop him He killed 15,000 Romans at Lake Trasimene  and 50,000 (!) at Cannae. Adding depth to the offence, the Roman Armies had been led by Consuls of Rome.Rome suffered as numerous of its subject colonies abandoned their allegiance and defeats continued. But the resolute Roman character was being forged in this crucible of defeat. And persistence and desperation drove them to gradually win back what they had lost in territory and to bring Hannibal to defeat in 201 B.C. and to gain Spain as compensation for their troubles.
                        DEPICTION OF HANNIBAL'S ELEPHANTS CROSSING THE RHONE
 
Hannibal returned to Carthage - from which he had received virtually no support in his long war. His fortunes there did not recover and he was exiled in 195 B.C. and committed suicide abroad in 183/182 B.C.

There is much more to the tale but no room for us to examine it here.


                         CARTHAGO DELENDA EST -THE RUINS OF ANCIENT CARTHAGE
 
The Romans adopted the policy that " Carthage must be destroyed"( " Carthago delenda est")  proposed by 84 yrs old Cato the Elder.They conquered it in 149 B.C. They thoroughly Romanized its culture and commerce and it became a great granary for Rome. It is estimated that the region (including Tripolitania in modern Libya) was then producing 1,000,000 tonnes of cereal per annum and 25% of that was going to Rome. Beans , figs, grapes and other fruits enhanced its value to the Romans and, in due course the production and export of olive oil became substantial. The entire trade was dynamic and valuable, even down to pottery and exotic wild animals for the Roman Arenas.

In time the City became Christian as did the Empire, but it fell under the influence of the heretic Berber Bishop Donatus Magnus - from A.D. 430 to 533 the Germanic Vandals invaded the City and ruled it. At the end of that period it was re-conquered by the Eastern Roman Empire under Belisarius. But in the second half of the 7th Century the Mohammedan hordes swept all before them, and established an Arab Mohammedan rule.This was not always stable as internal Mohammedan tribal/factional hatreds ebbed and flowed. In the 12th Century the Normans of Sicily briefly regained Christian control, but they were defeated in turn by the Arab Almohad Mohammedans who drove out or forced the conversion of or killed the last Christians in Tunisia.

Such is the complexity of the situation that this did not produce stability for long, because former factional Mohammedan enemies again contested the situation. By the 14th and 15th Centuries, the Hafsid Dynasty was trading peacefully with some Christian countries. However, in the late 16th Century the coast was home to the Barbary Pirates who so bedeviled shipping in the Mediterranean.

In the early 1500s Spain took possession of a number of coastal cities. But the Ottoman Empire conquered Tunisia in 1534 restoring Mohammedan control.They carried on governance via the appointment of a Bey who in effect ruled Tunisia as an independent country. This brought Tunis into conflict with the Bey of Algiers who was in a similar independent situation.

In 1881 France conquered establishing a " Protectorate" over Tunisia in view of its unmanageable foreign debt, but left the Beys in some degree of standing until 1957.During the Second World War Nazi and Italian forces were in Tunisia in substantial numbers until the defeat suffered at the hands of the Allies  and the Axis surrender on 13th May 1943.

Tunisia gained its independence from France in 1956 and President Habib Bourgiba led a secular Government until late 1987. He was succeeded by Abidine Ben Ali a military figure who won successive elections until driven out of power in the so-called Arab Spring.He and his family were accused of massive plundering of the country's wealth via corrupt practices. The new democratically elected Government has retained the secular nature of the Government, resisting Mohammedan zealots keen to re- introduce Sharia Law which had been abolished in 1956.Tunisia's " Code of Personal Status" is regarded as one of the most progressive civil codes in the Middle East and in Mohammedan countries.

Tunisia is a member of the European Union's " European Neighbourhood Policy" which aims to develop relations with neighbouring non-member countries.

The country has moderate military forces which have stayed free of political interference. These forces have served on international U.N. deployments in a number of African countries and even in Asia.

The principal trading relationship for Tunisia is that with the European Union. Although unemployment is significant , especially among youth, the Government has been energetic and even innovative in seeking to expand the economy.


And so as I set my tired eyes resolutely West towards Algeria, and extricate myself from tiny , but history strangled Tunisia , I wonder what that relatively large country holds in store.